Sunday, April 13, 2014

Crack spread - Oil Industry

Crack spread is a term used in the oil industry and futures trading for the differential between the price of crude oil and petroleum products extracted from it - that is, the profit margin that an oil refinery can expect to make by "cracking" crude oil (breaking its long-chain hydrocarbons into useful shorter-chain petroleum products).

In the futures markets, the "crack spread" is a specific spread trade involving simultaneously buying and selling contracts in crude oil and one or more derivative products, typically gasoline and heating oil. Oil refineries may trade a crack spread to hedge the price risk of their operations, while speculators attempt to profit from a change in the oil/gasoline price differential.
Factors affecting the crack spread

One of the most important factors affecting the crack spread is the relative proportion of various petroleum products produced by a refinery. Refineries produce many products from crude oil, including gasoline, kerosene, diesel, heating oil, aviation fuel, asphalt and others. To some degree, the proportion of each product produced can be varied in order to suit the demands of the local market. Regional differences in the demand for each refined product depend upon the relative demand for fuel for heating, cooking or transportation purposes. Within a region, there can also be seasonal differences in demand for heating fuel versus transportation fuel.

The mix of refined products is also affected by the particular blend of crude oil feedstock processed by a refinery, and by the capabilities of the refinery. Heavier crude oils contain a higher proportion of heavy hydrocarbons composed of longer carbon chains. As a result, heavy crude oil is more difficult to refine into lighter products such as gasoline. A refinery using less sophisticated processes will be constrained in its ability to optimize its mix of refined products when processing heavy oil.

Wednesday, April 09, 2014

Personal Development Sites

http://www.visualthinkingmagic.com/visual-thinking-questions - Visual Thinking Questions

http://www.davegrayinfo.com/2008/06/04/q-tools/   - Dave Grey Q Tools

Saturday, April 05, 2014

MVNO Demystified

virgin-mobile-logo
A mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) is a company that provides mobile phone service but does not have its own licensed frequency allocation of radio spectrum, nor does it necessarily have the entire infrastructure required to provide mobile telephone service. As per the MVNO directory 2009, there are 366 active MVNOs and there are another 89 potential MVNOs. The concept of MVNOs was coined by Sir Richard Branson of Virgin Mobile in UK in 1999 and Virgin is still the largest MVNO with over 4 million subscribers in UK. There are currently over 50 MVNOs in US and Netherlands. However in almost every country, the share of subscriber base with MVNO is less than 10% 
There are various forms of MVNOs depending on the value chain activities they cover. The figure below provides an overview of the various activities performed by different entities: 
mvno-value-chain
Image Copyright with Telecom Circle
 The fourth entity depicted as MVNO in the above diagram is essentially the “Thick MVNO” and is the most prevalent form of MVNO.  Key examples of Thick MVNO are Virgin, Lebara, Helio and while that of Mobile Virtual Network Enabler (MVNE) are Ztar, TMNG, Convergys and ASPIDER Solutions.
What does MVNO offer?
MVNOs normally try to leverage on one of the three strategic assets – Brand, Distribution or Existing Customer Base. The existing customer base can be non-mobile customer base that can be cross-leveraged for mobile services. There are MVNOs that try to offer better services for their customers, e.g.  Rabo Bank launched its own MVNO to serve its banking customers better. Communities of interest can come together to form a community MVNO, e.g. fans of Manchester United or McLaren can potentially brand an MVNO to display their sporting affinity. Wal Mart can use its distribution reach and loyal customer base to venture into the MVNO space.
The key strategic asset that MVNO brings to the table also defines its positioning in the market place. The broad classification of MVNOs is as follows
Business MVNOs focus on catering to the mobile services needs of business houses, e.g. Abica in UK offers cost savings on business mobile, landline and broadband services
Discount MVNOs provide cheaper services to their customers and price is their key differentiation
Niche MVNOs focus on a specific niche of the market and charge a premium for the brand
Ad Funded MVNOs have a business model that is based on advertisements and offer to provide free mobile services to their customers return for viewership of the advertisements, e.g. Blyk in UK
Ethnic MVNOs targets ethnic communities or other communities of interest by offering significant value to their customers, e.g. Lebara in UK offers reduced tariffs to its ethnic customers for calling their home countries
Convergence MVNOs are set of MVNOs that leverage on convergence, e.g. BT Mobile in UK and Italy. BT Mobile encompasses not only GSM but all wireless telecoms technologies and leads the field in Fixed-Mobile convergence­

Why do carriers (MNOs) find MVNOs attractive?
Operators look at MVNOs as an outsourcing partners to either reduce cost or increase productivity by reaching out to more customers profitably. No market is homogenous and consists of various segments which may not be equal in size. Operators may find it difficult to profitably target all the segments. MVNOs are a medium to implement a more specific marketing mix to suit the needs of the niche segments. MVNOs also help carriers reduce their costs as they take away a significant portion of operator costs like customer service delivery, billing, marketing, etc. MVNOs are able to offer these services at a lower cost by leveraging on their current assets. MVNOs may also help increase the revenues by way of reduced churn and increased ARPU.
Operators are particularly interested in MVNOs to better utilize their excess capacity. They can off load their excess capacity at marginal costing (at a discount to the normal tariffs) and can thus offer discounts to specific segments without having to offer it to its entire base.

Future of MVNOs
Despite the benefits that MVNOs can bring, the current share of subscribers in most of the markets they operate in is less than 10%. I am not sure if any MVNO is really making enough money to cover its expenses. The reason for this is that there is now a new entity in the form of MVNO that is trying to gain a pie of the value chain without increasing the value of the chain. This means that the margin needs to come from the carriers or through operating efficiencies. There is not enough inefficiency in the operator domain and hence the high margin opportunities are limited. The carriers are already under margin pressure and have a threat of getting marginalized and hence feel squeezed with the arrival of MVNOs.
An MVNO is only as strong as its ability to differentiate its services. An MVNO can differentiate itself through niche segments, its distribution depth and loyal customer base.
According to Whitey Bluestein, widely recognized as the creator of the first MVNO when he developed a virtual network operation for pre-WorldCom MCI in the mid 1990s,
There are three key areas that most new entrants simply have not thought out either tactically or strategically: distribution, customer churn and industry technology.
In many cases, the MVNOs do not have a clear technology roadmap and hence are not able to transition from 2G to 3G to 4G. Being asset light (read headcount), most of MVNOs have a limited ability to forecast future trends, pace of technology changes and hence miss out on opportunities. They have limited access to latest handsets in the operator driven markets unless they tie-up with the operators themselves for the handset deals.
Refer: http://telecomcircle.com

Wednesday, April 02, 2014

Objective vs Subjective


 



Objective

Subjective

Based upon Observation of measurable facts Personal opinions, assumptions, interpretations and beliefs
Commonly found in Encyclopedias, textbooks, news reporting Newspaper editorials, blogs, biographies, comments on the Internet
Suitable for decision making? Yes (usually) No (usually)
Suitable for news reporting? Yes No

Examples of Objective and Subjective Writing

Here are some examples of objective and subjective statements:
  • "47% of Americans pay no federal income tax. These people believe they are victims and would never vote for a Republican candidate." In this quote (which paraphrases Mitt Romney), the first statement is objective. It is a measurable fact that 47% of Americans do not pay federal income taxes. However, the second statement is Romney's personal point of view and is entirely subjective.
  • Apple only allows apps that the company has approved to be installed on iOS devices. The company does not care about openness of their platform. Once again the first statement here is objective, while the second is subjective because fans of the company could argue, as Steve Jobs did, that iOS is indeed an "open" platform.
Refer: http://www.diffen.com/difference/Objective_vs_Subjective


 

 

















BT turns attention to shaking up UK mobile market

A BT Openreach engineer checking lightweight overhead fibre deployed as part of a pilot in Falmouth, Cornwall©Johnnie Pakington/BT
BT is to mount a fresh challenge to mobile operators with cut-price bundled offers using its broadband network and the 4G spectrum it unexpectedly acquired last year.
Having shaken the pay-TV market with free Premier League football, BT is turning attention to reviving its lacklustre mobile business. The telecoms group has not been a major provider of mobile services since the sale of O2 more than a decade ago. 


BT will offer households a TV, broadband, and fixed and mobile telecoms on combined tariffs – the so-called “quad play” bundle that is increasingly popular in the US and Europe. 

It will launch offers for businesses towards the end of the year, according to people familiar with the situation, before focusing on the consumer market.
Those people say the central proposition is around data – taking the group’s fixed-line superfast data connections into the mobile market. BT is in early talks with handset makers about supplying devices, according to people familiar with the negotiations.

Analysts see the strategy as partly defensive. BT wants to reduce the loss of its lines in homes, which have been in decline for many years with people increasingly forsaking fixed-line calls for mobile. 

Offering an additional service has been proved as a way to strengthen customer loyalty, if only because people are less inclined to move a large number of services at one time to different suppliers.
But there is an offensive element to the mobile strategy, at least as far as the traditional mobile operators are concerned. They see the prospect of BT’s strong telecoms brand swinging in with disruptively low prices to entice customers to its premium broadband packages.
Quad play potential
The British market for quad play services is relatively small, with less than one in 10 households with fixed-line broadband also taking a mobile service and most of those signed up by Virgin Media.
But the option of offering such bundles is becoming important in European markets, even to the extent of influencing M&A activity. Telecoms groups such as Vodafone have aggressively pursued fixed-line businesses while media companies such as Liberty Global are adding mobile.
Large incumbent operators such as Holland’s KPN already offer quad play, which chief executive Eelco Blok says has boosted firepower in winning and retaining customers.
Analysts at Espirito said BT was “well placed to do similarly” and convert its 9.7m residential customers to additional mobile services. Espirito estimates that BT could win “several million mobile customers over the next few years”, offering about 5 per cent of revenue market share and adding 1-2 per cent to BT’s growth.

Disruptive deals
As on the continent, BT can innovate in both technology and tariffs to win mobile customers. Over time the company is expected to upgrade existing WiFi “home hubs” linked to its broadband network with so-called “femtocell” technology – in effect creating a small mast (or “small cell” in industry parlance) in the home that uses the 4G spectrum acquired for £200m in the government auction last year.
“How disruptive can BT be?” said analysts at Berenberg. “BT has form in using non-core products like BT Sport to defend its core products like broadband. We believe that it could take the same approach with mobile.”
Berenberg points out that fixed voice minutes on BT’s network have halved in the past six years, and estimates that two-thirds more would be lost by 2020. This is equivalent to £600m of high-margin revenue. “In our view, BT’s mobile opportunity is a disruptive offer aimed at defending its eroding fixed-voice revenue stream.”
BT’s long mobile history
BT has been a competitor in the mobile market since launching one of the UK’s first networks in 1986. However, the 2002 spin-off of O2, which was then called Cellnet, put the mobile business on the back burner, writes Daniel Thomas.
Read more
And that – with the potential to cross-subsidise bundled offers on services – means lower prices for customers and a headache for mobile operators. Although there are scores of cheap branded offers using their networks on a wholesale basis – from virtual operators such as Tesco and Asda – none has the brand or network that BT can leverage.
For example BT could offer an unlimited voice/SMS Sim for as little as £3 per month, with £4 per month charged per gigabyte of data, according to Berenberg analysts. “If BT can defend 30 per cent of the high-margin £600m voice revenues that we expect it to lose by 2020, it could be worth as much as £2bn in value.”

It is not just cheap Sim-only deals, however. A range of pricing options is expected from BT, including longer-term contracts that come with expensive smartphones, and mobile data bundles covering the home.
BT has not yet detailed its plans, only saying that services would build on a “strong WiFi presence”, while otherwise using EE’s network. Further details are likely to be confirmed after its full-year results on May 8.
Rival response

Mobile executives say it is difficult to gauge the impact of BT on their businesses until its packages are revealed. Indeed, analysts still question how disruptive they will be for the mobile industry. 

How disruptive can BT be? BT has form in using non-core products like BT Sport to defend its core products like broadband. We believe that it could take the same approach with mobile
- Berenberg analysts

UK mobile prices are some of the lowest in Europe, and the concept of quad play has not yet taken root, with only Virgin Media backing the strategy. Meanwhile, even if BT managed to sell mobile to half its broadband customers, that would account for only a single-digit share of the overall market.
But given existing pressures on revenues in the sector, mobile executives admit that the additional competition from a fifth mobile player with its own network is unwelcome and could put further pressure on prices.

BSkyB may also need to respond by adding mobile to create its own quad play offers. The recent talks about commercial deals between Sky and Vodafone have been seen by analysts as partly a response to the threat to both groups from a BT that spans the telephony, internet and TV markets.
It remains to be seen whether the average British household wants all these services bundled into one tariff – but this is a question that the former British telecoms incumbent is not afraid to explore.