Monday, December 30, 2013

Profit Center vs Cost Center



A profit center is a unit of a company that generates revenue in excess of its expenses. It is expected that, through the sale of goods or services, the unit will turn a profit. This is in contrast to a cost center, which is a unit inside a company that generates expenses with no responsibility for creating revenue. The only expectation a cost center has is to lower expenses whenever possible while staying with a specific budget that is determined at the corporate level.

Beyond that simple definition, the term "profit center" has also come to represent a form of management accounting that is organized around the profit center concept. Companies that have adopted the profit center system have organized all of their business units as either profit centers or cost centers, and all company financial results are reported in that manner. Adopting a profit center system often requires a radical shift in corporate philosophy and culture, but it can yield great returns in net before tax (NBT) profits. According to an article in Business Solutions, the data collection company Data Recognition, Inc. made the shift to a profit center-based system and was pleased with the results. "We saw the importance of evaluating, individually, areas of our business that are distinctly different," said Steve Terry, the company's vice president of systems. "The profit centers have allowed us to better identify specific gains and losses. And that's critically important for a growing business."

All companies, no matter what size, have both cost and profit centers (although, if it is a single-person company, that company would really have profit and cost activities, since all business "units" are the same person). For example, in most companies, units such as human resources and purchasing are strictly cost centers. The company has to spend money to operate those units, and neither has any means of producing a profit to offset those expenses. They exist solely to make it possible for other areas of the company to make money. However, without those two departments, the company could not survive. Examples of profit centers would be the manufacturing units that produce products for sale to consumers or other businesses. The sale of those products generates a profit that offsets the expense of creating the products.

All companies have profit centers and cost centers, but not all companies organize their accounting practices around the profit center concept. In fact, most companies do things the time-honored way, producing overall profit and loss statements for the company as a whole, without making each business unit accountable for generating a profit.

TURNING A COST CENTER INTO A PROFIT CENTER

A cost center may actually provide services that could generate a profit if they were offered on the open market. But in most corporate environments, cost centers are not expected to generate a profit and operation costs are treated as overhead. Departments that are typically cost centers include information technology, human resources, accounting, and others. However, the complacent acceptance that some departments will always be cost centers and can never generate a profit has changed at some companies. They recognize that cost centers can turn into profit centers by taking the services they used to automatically provide to the company's other business units and making those services available for a fee. The company's other business units are then required to pay for the services they used to get for free. But in return, they are allowed to go outside the company and contract with another firm to provide those services. Likewise, the former cost center may be allowed to sell its services to other companies. The expectation is that this free market system will improve performance through increased competition while increasing profits by turning former cost centers into profit centers.

"When a business firm becomes a corporate community of entrepreneurs who buy, sell, and launch new products and services internally as well as externally, it gains the same creative interplay that makes market economies so advantageous," said management professor William E. Halal when discussing making the move to profit center-based operations in USA Today Magazine.

As an example of how a cost center may be turned into a profit center, consider a company's information technology (IT) department. This department may provide such services as computer-aided design, network administration, or database development to other units of the company. These services have value, and they are important to the company's overall success, but they do not generate a profit. IT may charge the "cost" of its services back to the department that requested them, but it does not make a profit because it charges only for its actual costs incurred, without adding an extra margin for profit. The unit that requested the services absorbs the cost as part of its overhead; or, in some companies, the cost is not charged back and is simply part of the company's overall overhead.

There are two ways that the IT department could make the switch from cost center to profit center. First, instead of writing off its services to overhead or charging them at cost, the IT department could be allowed to bill other departments for its services at going market rates. The profit earned for the services would exceed the cost of providing the services. While all the money in this transaction would stay within the company, thus making it seem to be a meaningless way of creating a profit for the IT department, it is done for two reasons. One is to ensure that the IT department remains competitive with outside vendors providing the same services, and the other is to ensure that the company's other business units do not waste money on needless IT expenditures. Paying competitive market rates prevents the operating units from wasting money, thus making them more competitive.

If the IT department is turned into that type of profit center, it is considered to be a "zero profit center." In that situation, the department is expected to compete with outside vendors for the company's information technology budget. If a division of the company selects the IT department as its technology provider, it has done so because it feels it cannot purchase the same quality services for a lower price from an outside vendor. It will not actually "pay" the IT department for its services, but it will be charged by the IT department for services rendered, and those charges will be subtracted from the division's budget. Thus, the IT department does not really take in any revenue, but neither does it cost the company any money because the division that utilized its services would have had to spend money to hire an outside vendor. This, then, creates a zero profit center. Such a business model forces the IT department to be more competitive in its pricing and to provide high quality work if it hopes to survive as an operating unit.

The second way the IT department could become a profit center is if the company determined that the department was one of the best in the industry, better in fact than some companies that existed just to provide IT services. The company could then allow the department the freedom to sell its services to outside customers. Thus, the department would still operate as a cost center in its dealings with other units inside the company, but it would operate as a profit center when it provided services to outside companies. This method of operation has become far more common in the 1990s and beyond, as companies seek new revenue streams that have low start-up costs.

If the IT department exists only as a cost center, it faces enormous pressure to provide services at the lowest possible costs. Because it does not generate profits, it must constantly fight to remain in existence and must fight off attempts to slash its budget to free up cash for the company's profit centers. Just as the company's senior management could decide that the IT department was good enough to operate as a profit center by soliciting outside clients, so too could it decide that the department is behind the times and is not providing adequate services. This would result in management choosing to shut down the department and contract with an outside vendor for the company's IT needs.
PROFIT CENTERS AND THEIR CHANGING ROLE IN INDUSTRY

In large companies, especially manufacturing companies, it has become a fairly common occurrence to break the company into small pieces, with each piece operating as a profit center that has to compete for business. In this manner, a large business can suddenly find itself operating as a small business. For example, say the Acme Company produces a finished product that is composed of five smaller parts. Instead of operating as one large company that produces all five parts needed for the finished product, Acme has decided to split into six separate units—one that assembles and sells the finished product, and five smaller companies that each produce one of the parts needed for the finished product. Beyond Acme, there are other companies that produce those same five parts needed to produce the finished product.

Each of the five part manufacturers is now operating as a separate profit center, reporting to Acme's corporate office. Each has to determine its own methods of operation, and each has to determine how it is going to show a profit. There may be internal agreements in place that mandate that each of the five units will continue to work together to produce the finished product, or Acme may throw things wide open by stating that there is no corporate mandate forcing the five divisions to continue to work together.

If the latter model is chosen, the corporation may have decided that, while the company could continue making steady—but small—profits if it kept using the five units together as it had for decades, there was a chance that the company could make huge profits if it made each of the five units accountable for its own bottom line and opened up the manufacturing process to both internal and external competition. In such a radical environment, it was conceivable that one of the five units could go bankrupt and cost the company money, but senior management believed that the hugely increased profits in the other four units, and the resulting higher profit margin realized by the sale of the finished product, would more than offset the loss of one unit.

Thus, each of Acme's five units, formerly divisions within the larger company that were not accountable for directly generating profits, were now separate entities that had to show a profit to continue operating. Each of the units had gone from a cost center mentality—buying materials to produce part of a product that showed up on the company's overall bottom line—to a profit center mentality, responsible for showing a profit based solely on the production and sale of its one part. As part of the shift to becoming a profit center, each of the five units would also be free to sell its part on the open marketplace. Acme might make that freedom a restricted one that prevented sales to a direct competitor, or it might take the full plunge and make the unit a fully stand-alone company that was free to sell its part to any other company in the market, including direct competitors. That decision would dictate whether Acme's move was a small one, designed to encourage each of its five units to think creatively and work harder to perform at a high level, or a large one, designed to change the very core of the company's business in a bid for higher profits.
PROFIT CENTERS AND SMALL BUSINESSES

When operating a small business, it may not be practical to use the profit center concept initially because the business is so small. Fewer employees mean fewer business units, which means fewer opportunities to create profit centers. In addition, in a small business, the president or the chief financial officer is probably monitoring financial results very closely, which means that he or she knows exactly where profits and losses are occurring. However, as a small business begins to grow, establishing profit centers often makes sense. Data Recognition, Inc. found that switching to profit centers made sense as the company increased in size. "Establishing profit centers, and generating daily profit/loss statements, has allowed us to better identify, and correct, our weaknesses," said vice president Steve Terry.

Even without adopting the profit center accounting concept, the idea of profit centers has value for small businesses in that they should always be looking for new ways to generate revenue. When operating a small business, there are essentially two ways to create a new profit center. The first method is to create an extension of the original business—a new product related to existing products, or new services that build on services that are already offered. The second method is to create an entirely new business altogether that can operate using the first business's corporate infrastructure (at least initially) and that can be operated at the same time as the original business.

The rapid spread of the World Wide Web has created an unprecedented method for creating new profit centers. Almost every company today has a Web site to dispense public relations information and to make it easier for customers to contact the company, but more and more firms are recognizing that there is money to be made on the Web. Most corporate Web sites begin life as a cost center, since they are initially just used to disseminate information, but most can be transformed into a profit center.

When seeking new profit centers, small business entrepreneurs should avoid business models that have regularly failed on the Web. These include setting up an entertainment site that attempts to charge a fee for that entertainment; relying on advertising as a revenue stream, as banner advertisements are proving to be quite unsuccessful in bringing in new customers; charging subscription or other visitor fees; and biting off more than you can handle by attempting to establish business-to-business sales that may not be achievable.



Business function chart


BUSINESS FUNCTIONS CHART


Good companies meet demands, great companies create demands.


Internal functions are those which are part of the company. 
External functions are those which are supplied by an outside agency.





This chart is a simplification. Not all companies can be easily categorised, and some will have specialist functions which are not included here, but is nevertheless provides a useful starting point for graduates considering a career in business.

Specialised businesses will have functions not mentioned here, for example retailers will have staff working as merchandisers.Some companies will not have all the functions listed, for example service and finance companies will not normally have research and production departments.

Some functions such as Market Research and PR may be internal, external or both. A small company will probably hire an external agency when it needs these functions. A large company may well have in-house market research and corporate PR staff, but will still outsource much of the work that is of a specialist nature.


PRODUCING
Research & Development

Develops products. Designs & conducting experiments & tests. Interprets data. Manages projects. Writes reports. Keeps up to date with new developments.
Production & Quality
Manages the production process. Plans production schedules. Ensures that machinery, staff & materials are efficiently utilised. Monitors health & safety & environmental issues. Liaises with marketing, research & finance.
Distribution/Logistics
Manages all the supply chain processes from raw materials to where the end product is used. Coordinates supply, distribution & storage of goods. Manages transport & distribution centres including drivers & warehouse staff.

SELLING

Sales

Demonstrates & presents products to customers. Manages budgets. Learns about new products. Makes sure that the product meets the customers requirements. Writes tenders & proposals.

Marketing

Coordinates all the elements involved in successfully promoting & selling a product: market research, pricing, packaging, advertising, sales, distribution. Involves forecasting, budgeting & planning, implementation of plans.

SUPPORT FUNCTIONS

FINANCE - Management Accountant

Provides the information required for the financial protection & planning of companies. Prepares accounting records & management information.

Computing

Designs, implements & maintains computer systems to meet requirements of users. Provides computing support for staff. Maintains databases & networks.

HR/Personnel

Recruits & selects new staff. Involved with contracts of employment, job descriptions, training, management development, industrial relations & disciplinary matters.

Buying/Purchasing/Procurement

Locates & maintains relationships with suppliers, of products. Negotiates prices, delivery dates & product specifications. Works with managers to anticipate future demands.


EXTERNAL SERVICES
Chartered Accountants

Visits clients as part of an audit team; reviews their business operations & financial records to establish the validity of the company's accounts. Advises on tax liability & other matters.

Management Consultants

Identifies & investigates, problems concerned with policy, organisation, procedures & methods of organisations. Recommends appropriate action & helps to implement this.

Recruitment Agency

Matches job-seekers with employers' vacancies. Assesses candidates' skills & employers' requirements.

Advertising

Liaises with & advises clients on all aspects of marketing communications; presents proposals to clients; manages advertising spend budget; keeps clients up-to-date on their own & competitors activities.

Market Research

This can be done by the marketing department inside a company, or by an external market research agency. Plans market research projects on behalf of the client. Analyses the problem. Drafts proposals. Prepares questionnaires & survey methods. Briefs interviewers. Analyses data & presents it to client. Prepares reports.

Public Relations

All aspects of media & public relations for clients: e.g. corporate brochures & exhibition stands. Answers enquiries. Prepares press releases, organises press briefings, conferences & PR campaigns.

Saturday, December 28, 2013

Restricted Stock Unit

Definition of 'Restricted Stock Unit'

Compensation offered by an employer to an employee in the form of company stock. The employee does not receive the stock immediately, but instead receives it according to a vesting plan and distribution schedule after achieving required performance milestones or upon remaining with the employer for a particular length of time. The restricted stock units (RSU) are assigned a fair market value when they vest. Upon vesting, they are considered income, and a portion of the shares are withheld to pay income taxes. The employee receives the remaining shares and can sell them at any time.

For example, suppose Madeline receives a job offer. Because the company thinks Madeline's skill set is particularly valuable and hopes she will remain a long-term employee, it offers part of her compensation as 500 RSUs, in addition to a generous salary and benefits. The company's stock is worth $40 per share, making the RSUs potentially worth an additional $20,000. To give Madeline an incentive to stay with the company and receive the 500 shares, it puts them on a five-year vesting schedule. After one year of employment, Madeline will receive 100 shares; after two years, another 100, and so on until she has received all 500 shares at the end of five years. Depending on how the company's stock performs, Madeline may actually receive more or less than $20,000.

The RSUs, thus, give Madeline an incentive not only to stay with the company long term, but to help it perform well so that her shares will become more valuable. In fact, Madeline decides to hold the shares until she receives all 500, at which point the company's stock is worth $50 and Madeline receives $25,000, minus the value of the shares that were withheld for income taxes and the amount due in capital gains taxes. However, if Madeline had left the company after 18 months, she would have received only the 100 shares that vested after year one. She would have forfeited the remaining 400 shares to the company.

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Jaypee, GMR, GVK, JSW, Lanco and Videocon - Cumulative Debt set to Increase

Their cumulative debt climbed 15 % to `6.3 lakh crore last fiscal
New Delhi (PTI): The country's ten leading business houses, including Reliance Group, Vedanta, Essar and Adani, have seen their total debt levels soar by 15 per cent to over Rs 6 lakh crore during the last fiscal while profitability continues to remain under pressure, a research report said on Monday.

The cumulative debt of these groups, which also include Jaypee, GMR, GVK, JSW, Lanco and Videocon, is likely to further increase in the current fiscal because of rupee depreciation and delays in projects being undertaken by many of them, Credit Suisse said its annual House of Debt report for India.

According to the report, the collective debt of these ten groups rose to Rs 6,31,025 crore at the end of last fiscal ended March 31, 2013, from Rs 5,47,361 crore a year ago.

"For most of them the debt increase has outpaced capex and asset sales are yet to take off. The rising stress is visible with some loans of Lanco, JPA, and (Anil Ambani-led) Reliance groups already being restructured," it said. "The largest increases have been at groups such as GVK, Lanco and ADA where the gross debt levels are up 24 per cent year-over-year. Asset sales- key for de-leveraging for most of these - have still not taken-off; only GMR and Videocon have had some success on that front," Credit Suisse said. The report also warned of additional asset quality stress of banks because of growing debt levels of big business houses.

While large corporate NPLs (non performing loans) are still low, the overleverage in the large corporate segment is high and is a potential source of additional asset quality stress for banks, it said, while adding that corporate asset quality issues are likely to persist for the banking sector. Observing that the rupee weakening could cause further pain going further, the report said that delays in power projects being undertaken by many of these groups could result in more of their debt being restructured.

However, companies such as Adani Power, Reliance Power and GMR Infra would see their operating capacities double if the projects were to come on stream as expected. "Many corporates' loans are 40-70 per cent foreign currency denominated; therefore, the sharp depreciation in the rupee is adding to their debt burden. Adani Enterprise and Reliance Comm have the largest percentage of borrowings through forex loans," it said.

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Digital Marketing Case Studies

Digital Marketing Case Studies -

http://www.digitaltrainingacademy.com/casestudies/

What is Cost of Goods Sold for a Service Business?

What is Cost of Goods Sold for a Service Business?


When it comes to a service business, Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) doesn’t quite make sense.  If you want to be precise, COGS is only used for product based businesses.

So what if you operate an IT service company, what is your COGS?  What if you develop and sell software, what is your COGS?
Rather than using the term cost of goods sold, it would be best to use a similar term — Cost of Revenue.


Cost of Revenue for Service Based Businesses


Now I want to dive deep into exactly what Cost of Revenue is and what it is not.  I also want to help you determine your cost of revenue on a per unit basis.


Definition: “The total cost of manufacturing and delivering a product or service. Cost of revenue information is found in a company’s income statement, and is designed to represent the direct costs associated with the goods and services the company provides. Indirect costs, such as salaries, are not included.”


To Be Included in Cost of Revenue

Raw Materials – Service based businesses don’t have “raw materials” but if you were a product based business, you would include all raw materials used to produce the product in cost of revenue.

Direct Labor – Direct labor should be included in cost of revenue.  Let’s say you own a junk removal business, and you get a job to clean up an old building.  It will be a 3 hour job for your team of 3 guys.  Each guy is paid $10 per hour.  Your employees wages is considered cost of revenue, so in this scenario you would have $90 in direct labor costs that would be included in your cost of revenue.

Shipping Costs – Let’s say you own an accounting firm that audits companies.  At the end of the audit you print your report and mail copies to each member of the client’s board of directors.  If you end up paying $100 to ship your report to the board, that $100 should be included in cost of revenue because it is a necessary expense that you incur as part of your service.

Sales Commissions - Sales commissions are another common expense that should be included in cost of revenue.  You only incur sales commission expenses when you generate revenue through a sale of your product or service; therefore, sales commissions should be included in your cost of revenue.

A common rule of thumb when determining what is cost of revenue and what is not, is to simply ask yourself, “Would I incur this expense if I did not make a sale today?”


Not to Be Included in Cost of Revenue


Now I will go through a list of expenses that you would incur whether or not you sold a product or service.  These expenses should not be included in cost of revenue.

Salaries – Employee salaries are not directly tied to revenue, in other words, your employees are paid the same salary each month whether they sell more or less goods and services.

Rent – Your rent expense is another overhead cost that is not included in cost of revenue.

Phone Service – The phone bill will arrive each month whether you sell 100 widgets or 1,000,000 widgets; therefore, it is not to be considered part of your cost of revenue.

Utilities – Now this might be up for debate because your utilities might go up or down based heavily upon your sales volume, but even if you did not sell any product or service next week wouldn’t you still turn the lights on? 
Wouldn’t you still heat or call your office building?  In general your utilities are not considered as past of Cost of Goods Sold or Cost of Revenue.


Cost of Revenue Per Unit


Once you have determined which expenses to include in cost of revenue, you should come up with your cost of revenue per unit.  Cost of Goods Sold per unit and Cost of Revenue per unit is the model we use with our ProjectionHub application.

Essentially you need to breakdown each expense that your cost of revenue is comprised of into a unit cost.  
For example:
Let’s say you own a tree service company.  Let’s go through the cost of revenue for one day-long tree service job.  Your cost of revenue might look like this:

Sales Commission – You might have a sales representative who secured the job for you, who you will need to pay a commission.  Let’s assume you give a 15% sales commission.

Fuel Costs – You have to drive out to the job site with a fleet of 3 vehicles and equipment.  This is an expense that you would only incur if you got the job; therefore, it should be included in cost of revenue.  The job site is 50 miles away, so each vehicle will drive a 100 mile round trip.  So 300 miles at .50 cents a mile is $150.

Direct Labor – Lastly, you will have direct labor costs.  Let’s assume it takes a team of 5 to complete the job in 8 hours. You pay them each $10 per hour.
Now that you have identified your 3 items that make of cost of revenue, you need to bring this down to cost of revenue per unit.  The unit that most service businesses use is hours.  Let’s say you charge the client $300 per hour.  Your cost per hour would look something like this:

5 workers x $10 = $50 per hour
15% of $2,400 job = 360 sales commission / 8 hours = $45 per hour
$150 / 8 hours = $18.75 per hour

Add that together and you get $113.75 per hour as your cost of revenue.
$300 – $113.75 = $186.25 is your gross profit.
There you have it.  That is how you calculate both cost of revenue and gross profit for a service based business.

Refer: http://www.projectionhub.com/financial-projection-blog/what-is-cost-of-goods-sold-for-a-service-business/

Cost of Labor

Definition of 'Cost Of Labor'

The sum of all wages paid to employees, as well as the cost of employee benefits and payroll taxes paid by an employer. The cost of labor is broken into direct and indirect costs. Direct costs include wages for the employees physically making a product, like workers on an assembly line. Indirect costs are associated with support labor, such as employees that maintain factory equipment but don't operate the machines themselves.

Investopedia explains 'Cost Of Labor'

When manufacturers set the price of a good they take the cost of labor into account. This is because they need to charge more than that good's total cost of production. If demand for a good drops or the price consumers are willing to pay for the good falls, companies must adjust their the cost of labor to remain profitable. They can reduce the number of employees, cut back on production, require higher levels of productivity, reduce indirect labor costs or reduce other factors in the cost of production.

Monday, December 23, 2013

Types of Industries

Labour-intensive or Capital-intensive production?

It is important to distinguish between capital-intensive and labour-intensive methods of production.

Capital-intensive



  • ‘Capital’ refers to the equipment, machinery, vehicles and so on that a business uses to make its product or service.
  • Capital-intensive processes are those that require a relatively high level of capital investment compared to the labour cost.
  • These processes are more likely to be highly automated and to be used to produce on a large scale.
  • Capital-intensive production is more likely to be associated with flow production (see below) but any kind of production might require expensive equipment.
  • Capital is a long-term investment for most businesses, and the costs of financing, maintaining and depreciating this equipment represents a substantial overhead.
  • In order to maximise efficiency, firms want their capital investment to be fully utilised (see notes on capacity utilisation).
  • In a capital-intensive process, it can be costly and time-consuming to increase or decrease the scale of production.

Labour-intensive



  • ‘Labour’ refers to the people required to carry out a process in a business.
  • Labour-intensive processes are those that require a relatively high level of labour compared to capital investment.
  • These processes are more likely to be used to produce individual or personalised products, or to produce on a small scale
  • The costs of labour are: wages and other benefits, recruitment, training and so on.
  • Some flexibility in capacity may be available by use of overtime and temporary staff, or by laying-off workers.
  • Long-term growth depends on being able to recruit sufficient suitable staff.
  • Labour intensive processes are more likely to be seen in Job production and in smaller-scale enterprises.
Capital intensive refers to the degree that a company must invest money in physical or financial assets in order to produce a profit.

How It Works/Example:


Airlines, auto manufacturers, and drilling operations are often considered capital-intensive businesses because they require large amounts of expensive equipment and raw materials to make their products. Businesses like web site design, insurance, or tax preparation generally depend on labor rather than physical assets and are thus not considered capital intensive.


Although there is no mathematical threshold that definitively determines whether an industry is capital intensive, most analysts look to a company’s capital expenses in relation to its labor expense. The higher the ratio between capital and labor expenses, the more capital intensive a business is. For example, if Company XYZ spent $10,000,000 on equipment in one year but only $3,000,000 on labor, Company XYZ is probably in a capital-intensive industry.

Why It Matters:

Capital-intensive businesses need a lot of money to keep operations going. Thus, capital intensity serves as a barrier to entry, and existing capital-intensive businesses benefit from this. Having this barrier to entry means it is difficult for new companies to begin operating in capital-intensive industries. For instance, it is highly unlikely a new aircraft firm would begin operations and compete with the likes of Boeing, since it costs billions in capital to begin producing airplanes.

Definition of 'Labor Intensive'

A process or industry that requires a large amount of labor to produce its goods or services. The degree of labor intensity is typically measured in proportion to the amount of capital required to produce the goods/services; the higher the proportion of labor costs required, the more labor intensive the business.

Investopedia explains 'Labor Intensive'

Labor intensive industries include restaurants, hotels, agriculture and mining. Advances in technology and worker productivity have moved some industries away from labor-intensive status, but many still remain.

Labor costs are considered variable, while capital costs are considered fixed. This gives labor-intensive industries an advantage in controlling expenses during market downturns by controlling the size of the employee base. Disadvantages include limited economies of scale (you can't pay workers less by hiring more of them), and susceptibility to wage forces within the labor market.

'Capital Intensive' - Industry

A business process or an industry that requires large amounts of money and other financial resources to produce a good or service. A business is considered capital intensive based on the ratio of the capital required to the amount of labor that is required.

Some industries commonly thought of as capital intensive include oil production and refining, telecommunications and transports such as railways and airlines. 

Investopedia explains 'Capital Intensive'

In all of the above industries, a large financial commitment is required just to get the first unit of good or service produced. Once the upfront investments are made, there may be economies of scale with regards to ongoing expenses and sales growth. But the initial hurdle to get into the business tends to keep the list of competitors small, creating high barriers to entry. 



Saturday, December 14, 2013

Difference User Experience vs Customer Experience

Some of the key differences between these two established fields.

Difference #1: Scope

UX professionals typically focus on the design and development of digital interfaces—today that translates primarily into websites, tablet apps, and mobile apps. And, as the name “UX” implies, UX practitioners typically refer to the people who interact with those interfaces as “users.”
To belabor the obvious, CX professionals hardly ever mention “users”—they talk about “customers” instead. They focus on the interactions that customers have at every stage of the customer journey: discover, evaluate, buy, access, use, get support, leave, and re-engage. CX practitioners are interested not only in digital touch points, but also in marketing communications, product packaging, checkout counters, receipts, face-to-face conversations with sales reps, and phone calls to customer service.
That’s why at Forrester Research, we define CX as how customers perceive their interactions with your company. We’re not talking about some subset of customer interactions. We’re talking about all of them.

Difference #2: Educational & Professional Background

UX professionals typically hail from one of three primary backgrounds: behavioral sciences (into which I’d lump fields like anthropology, psychology, and cognitive science), design, or technology. Degrees and/or professional experience in these fields prepare UX professionals for tasks like determining what types of products and services people need, designing the appropriate interactions, and bringing them to life.
This background is also relevant for a career in customer experience. After all, non-digital interactions need to be defined, designed, and implemented, too. And yet surprisingly few of today’s CX professionals can claim a UX background. That’s probably because in addition to designing customer interactions, CX professionals must also engage in what we lovingly refer to as customer experience management. This translates into myriad tasks that collectively look much more like massive organizational change management than anything that resembles traditional UX work.
Change management requires one of two qualities: authority or influence. Because most customer experience professionals don’t have overarching organizational authority (yet)—and perhaps because influence is more effective in the long run, anyway—most companies appoint candidates to CX positions based on the quality of their existing internal relationships, not on pedigree.
In Forrester’s recent analysis of 177 chief customer officers, we found that 55% were internal hires. And the most common backgrounds for these professionals included marketing, operations, sales, service, and strategy. Notably missing from that list? UX.

Difference #3: Tools & Methodologies

If you’re a regular reader of UX Mag, you probably don’t need me to get into the details of UX tools and methodologies. You know this like the back of your hand. So let me instead focus on the tools and methodologies of customer experience. Forrester’s CX maturity model describes six disciplines that companies need to master in order to create and sustain high quality customer experiences.
The first three disciplines help companies define the right customer experience—the experience that will meet (or exceed) the needs of customers and that will support the business and brand. Those disciplines are strategy, customer understanding, and design.

Strategy: When business people talk about strategy, they’re often referring to a roadmap or plan of some sort. But a CX strategy is a description of the experience that a company intends to deliver. For example, Holiday Inn defined a CX strategy dubbed The Social Hub. It set the stage for an innovative lobby experience that was rooted in the hotel’s key brand attributes (purposeful, inclusive, social, and familiar) and in the activities that its guests wanted to do (eat and drink, relax, and have fun). The heart of the Social Hub strategy states: “We give our guests flexible options so they can be themselves. That way they don’t have to leave the hotel to get what they want. They can find it at the Holiday Inn.”

Customer Understanding: A company’s CX strategy is only effective if it’s rooted in a clear and accurate understanding of who its customers are, how they’re interacting with the company today, and what they want and need from the company tomorrow. CX professionals sometimes employ research methodologies—like ethnographic research and usability studies—that are familiar in UX land. In addition, CX professionals use surveys and focus groups to solicit customer feedback; dig into analytics and big data; mine social media, phone calls, email, and chats to determine customer sentiment; and tap into the knowledge of frontline and backstage employees.

Design: This is the same mindset and problem-solving process that UX professionals apply every day in their jobs. Here, it’s just applied to a wider range of customer interactions. For example, Mayo Clinic prototyped new outpatient exam rooms with foam core and cardboard, and service design agency live|work redesigned call center interactions for Gjensidige, Norway’s largest insurance company.
Again, the three disciplines above help CX professionals create the right experience. The second set of disciplines helps companies manage those experiences effectively. Those disciplines are measurement, governance, and culture.

Measurement: CX professionals use three types of metrics to determine the business impact of customer interactions. First, we’ve got perception metrics: these tell a company what their customers think and feel about their interactions. Then, we’ve got descriptive metrics: this is the operational piece that tells a company what really happened.
For example, a customer might think that they were on hold for “forever,” and the descriptive metric shows that she was really on hold for two and half minutes. In tandem, these two metrics enable CX professionals to set benchmarks for CX quality. Finally, we layer on outcome metrics, which indicate what customers will do as a result of their experience, like purchase again or recommend to a friend. In total, these three metrics enable CX professionals to build financial models that tell them what’s going right, what’s going wrong, and what kind of business benefits they can expect from making specific improvements.

Governance: We typically talk about two types of CX governance: reactive and proactive. Reactive governance involves listening to customers talk about their problems, prioritizing their issues, fixing the ones that will have the biggest impact, and then closing the loop (telling customers what’s been done to make their lives better). Proactive governance involves making sure that CX problems don’t get introduced in the first place. For example, FedEx employees who want to introduce a new project, process, or technology must fill out a form to identify which touch points their proposed initiative will impact and how. This helps to keep problems from bubbling up to customers as an unintended consequence of other initiatives.

Culture: Culture is about driving customer-centricity into an organization’s DNA, and there are three primary levers you can pull to make this happen. The first is hiring. Companies need to hire people who have an innate desire to serve customers. When hiring new call center agents, American Express doesn’t look for call center or financial services experience, instead it looks for applicants from cruise lines, retail stores, and restaurants. The second lever is socializiation, which translates into activities like training, storytelling, and rituals that celebrate customer-centric attitudes and behavior. The third lever is rewards. This includes informal rewards, like movie tickets and recognition at company meetings. It also includes formal rewards, like bonuses and promotions based on performance against CX metrics.

Conclusion

So what does all of this mean for you, dear reader? I know that many UX professionals don’t give a hoot about CX. They’d rather immerse themselves in the details of the latest technology, or geek out over typefaces and Photoshop shortcuts, or surround themselves with thousands of Post-It notes from their latest ethnographic research study. And that’s OK. In fact, it’s more than OK. (Honestly, there are lots of days when I’m right there with you.) But maybe, somewhere, there’s a UX professional who’s looking for something a little different. And to you, I say: Consider the field of CX. You’d be an awesome fit.

Refer: http://uxmag.com/articles/a-deep-dive-into-customer-experience
 

Top 20 Contact Center Metrics

In the 21st century, the call center has evolved into a multichannel contact center. Customers have heightened expectations of service and frontline staffs have new demands and requirements.
As your contact center evolves, you must ask yourself if the measures of performance that have served you well in the last decade are the same ones that will determine how well your contact center is operating today. This article will examine the top performance measures commonly associated with personnel and the processes in today’s multichannel catalog center.
We’ll take the approach of looking at metrics that supply you with critical information related to each contact center stakeholder group. In other words, as you think about the three main groups of people you need to keep happy every single day, you’ll want to make sure you have measures in place to track how well you’re satisfying each group.

The three main stakeholder groups are pretty obvious. The most important group is, of course, is your customer base. The second group is the senior management team. And the third group is your contact center workforce.

We’ll explore measures of service and quality related to customers, efficiency and profitability for senior management, and workplace and satisfaction concerns for the frontline staff.

Service measures

Customer concerns come first, so let’s begin with some of the metrics associated with how we define service to the caller.
Blockage
Blockage is an accessibility measure that indicates what percentage of customers will not be able to access the center at a given time due to insufficient network facilities in place. Measures indicating blockage (busy signals) by time of day or occurrences of “all trunks busy” situations are utilized by most centers. Failure to include a blockage goal allows a center to always meet its speed of answer goal by simply blocking the excess calls. This can have a negative effect on customer accessibility and satisfaction while the call center looks like it is doing a great job in terms of managing the queue.
The contact center must also carefully determine the number of facilities needed in terms of both bandwidth and email server capacity to ensure that large quantities of emails do not overload the system. While this provisioning is typically monitored by the IT or telecom department and not by the contact center, it should still be a measure that is reviewed regularly to make sure callers are not being turned away at the front door.

Abandon rate
Call centers measure the number of abandons as well as the abandon rate since both correlate with retention and revenues. It should be noted, however, that abandon rate is not entirely under the call center’s control. While abandons are affected by the average wait time in queue (which can be controlled by the call center), there are a multitude of other factors that influence this number, such as individual caller tolerance, time of day, availability of service alternatives, and so on. Abandon rate is not typically a measure associated with email communications, since the email does not abandon the “queue” once it has been sent, but it does apply to web chat interactions.  

Self-service availability
More and more contacts are being off-loaded today from call center agents to self-service alternatives. In the call center, self-service utilization is an important gauge of accessibility and is typically measured as an overall number, by self-service methodology and menu points, and by time of day or by demographic group. In the contact center, self-service utilization should also be tracked. In cases of Web chat, automated alternatives such as FAQs or use of help functions can reduce the requirement for the live interaction with a Web chat agent.

Service level/ASA
Service level, the percentage of calls that are answered in a defined wait threshold, is the most common speed of answer measure in the call center. It is most commonly stated as x percent of calls handled in y seconds or less, while average speed of answer (ASA) represents the average wait time of all calls in the period. In the contact center, speed of answer for Web chat should also be measured and reported with a service level or ASA number. Many centers measure for both initial response as well as the back-and-forth times, since having too many open web chat sessions can slow the expected response time once an interaction has begun. The speed of answer for email transactions on the other hand is defined as a “response time” and may be depicted in terms of hours or even days, rather than in seconds or minutes of elapsed time.

Summary of service measures
The most critical of these availability and speed of service measures is the service level number and it’s worthwhile to note here that this metric has evolved in recent years to provide a more practical, realistic view of the service being delivered to callers. Traditionally, service level (or ASA) was measured and reported as a average number – typically an average number for the day. However, there are many problems with this measurement approach. Since most contact centers have peaks and valleys of calls throughout the day, the service level from one period to the next can vary greatly. The overstaffed periods of the day generate a very high service level, while understaffed periods have very low numbers. The end result is an average for the day that may come close to the goal, but a number that does not reflect the actual picture of service for the day. Overstaffing results in needless expense for staff and low productivity, while understaffing means long delays, overworked staff, and higher costs and the measure of service for the day needs to be one that reflects this service better than just the average for day (or worse, average for the week or month).

A better approach for measuring service level is to have a measure that notes the number of periods of the day where service level was acceptable. If the goal is 80% in 30 seconds, then a reasonable measure may be to look at the number of half-hour periods of the day that were between 75% and 85%.This measure provides more of a view of the consistency of service being delivered, which in turn affects customer perceptions, employee workload, and bottom-line efficiency and cost.

Quality measures

In addition to the “how fast” measures outlined above, perhaps a more significant indicator of customer satisfaction is “how well” the contact was handled, indicated by the following measures.

First call resolution rate
The percentage of transactions that are completed within a single contact, often called the “one and done” ratio or first call resolution (FCR) rate, is a crucial measure of quality. It gauges the ability of the center, as well as of an individual, to accomplish an interaction in a single step without requiring a transfer to another person or area, or needing another transaction at a future time to resolve the customer issue. The FCR rate is a crucial factor in customer perception of quality. The satisfactory resolution of a call is tracked overall in the center, as well as by type of call, and perhaps by time of day, by team, or by individual.

The one-contact resolution rate should likewise be tracked in the contact center for email transactions and Web interactions. The resolution rate will likely be lower for emails, as it generally takes multiple messages between two parties to resolve a matter to completion.
Recent studies have shown that the FCR rate is the single number most closely correlated with customer satisfaction. Nothing impacts customers’ perceptions more than simply getting their question answered or problem resolved on the first try. Therefore, this FCR rate should rank very high on your list of contact center KPIs.

It’s not always easy to figure out and may take some piecing together of information from your ACD and contact management system, but it’s worth the extra effort to track it and do whatever it takes to increase the rate. Remember, the higher your rate, the happier your customers!

Transfer rate
The transfer percentage is an indication of how many contacts have to be transferred to another person or place to be handled. Tracking transfers can help fine-tune the routing strategies as well as identify performance gaps of the staff. Likewise, tracking emails that must be transferred to others or text chat interactions that require outside assistance is useful to identify personnel training issues or holes in on-line support tools. This transfer rate is an important number to track as it plays an important part in the FCR rate that impacts customer satisfaction so highly.

Communications skills
One of the critical factors that impact the caller’s perception of how well the call was handled is simple etiquette and customer service skills. The degree to which general communications skills and etiquette are displayed is generally measured via observation or some form of quality monitoring as an individual gauge of performance. Email and web chat etiquette should also be observed. There are standard wordings that should be followed in both types of communications that should be carefully observed, reviewed, and reported as a quality measure of performance. This is particularly true since a written record of the interaction will exist. One of the keys to measuring the effectiveness of communications skills is to make sure you have specific guidelines and definitions of what content and behaviors look like when done right. Define wording you want to hear (or see) and what processes should be followed and then watch and listen for compliance with the expectation.
Be careful about not clearly defining what a quality transaction contains, such as quality forms that specify “demonstrated professional attitude.” You will want to define the specific content that should be used and what should be avoided in customer conversations so that call reviews and coaching can continually fine-tune skills in the right direction.

Adherence to procedures
Adherence to procedures such as workflow processes or call scripts is another essential element of quality. This is particularly important to perceived quality in terms of the customer receiving a consistent interaction regardless of the contact channel or the individual agent involved in the contact.
In the call center, adherence to processes and procedures is typically measured for individuals through simple observation and through the quality monitoring process.

Adherence to processes and procedures is also important for other channels of contact. Written scripts and pre-approved responses are generally created, and adherence to these is monitored and recorded via observation or screen capture capabilities in a quality monitoring system.
Customer satisfaction surveys. Many of the numbers and metrics discussed so far focus on internal metrics – measuring inside the contact center and judging how well you’re doing based on your own standards of performance. But it’s also important to look outside the center and go straight to the source for measures of customer satisfaction.

Ask your customers regularly how they think your call center is performing. While your company may have regular customer satisfaction surveys to gather feedback on a wide range of questions about products, pricing, etc, it’s important to fine-tune and gather specific feedback related to the service they received in their interaction with the call center.

Most organizations can benefit greatly from some professional help in writing and fine-tuning their survey instrument, administering it in a way that ensures data validity and reliability, and analyzing survey results. A good starting place to help you understand the important elements and design surveys that maximize customer feedback is Fred Van Bennekom’s book, Customer Surveying.


Efficiency measures

Executives in every type of organization are concerned with how well the company’s resources are being put to use. That is especially true in a call center environment where the overwhelming majority of operating expenses are related to personnel costs.

Agent occupancy
Agent occupancy is the measure of actual time busy on customer contacts compared to available or idle time, calculated by dividing workload hours by staff hours. Occupancy is an important measure of how well the call center has scheduled its staff and how efficiently resources are being used. If occupancy is too low, agents are sitting around idle with not enough to do. If occupancy is too high, the personnel may be overworked.
Agent occupancy is the end result of how staffing is matched to randomly arriving workload in a call center. However, the desired level of occupancy may actually drive staffing decisions in a sequential work environment like processing emails. Since web chat interactions are essentially random events like incoming calls, the same measures of occupancy apply here as in an incoming call scenario.

Staff shrinkage
Staff shrinkage is defined as the percentage of time that employees are not available to handle calls. It is classified as non-productive time, and is made up of meeting and training time, breaks, paid time off, off-phone work, and general unexplained time where agents are not available to handle customer interactions. Staff shrinkage is an important number to track, since it plays an important role in how many people will need to be scheduled each half-hour. The same measures of shrinkage that are used for call center calculations apply to the multichannel contact center as well.

It is important to track shrinkage by individual category. While some time categories are unavoidable, such as paid time off and training time, other categories should be tracked with an objective of controlling the loss of available hours over time.

Schedule efficiency
Workforce management is all about getting the “just right” number of people in place each period of the day to handle customer contacts—not too many and not too few. Schedule efficiency measures the degree of overstaffing and understaffing that exist as a result of scheduling design. Net staffing may be measured by half-hour as an indication of how well the resources in the center are being utilized.

Schedule efficiency for responding to the randomly arriving web chats should be measured just like that for incoming call centers. Since emails typically represent sequential rather than random workload, the work fits the schedule and therefore overstaffing and understaffing measures are less relevant. Just like for measures of service, it is likely that schedule efficiency varies over the day and week as peaks and valleys of incoming contacts make it difficult to get the exact right number of staff each half-hour. Rather than looking at the plus and minus status averaged out over the day, it is important to look at the variation that occurs by half-hour so that schedule plans can be adjusted to best match workforce to workload.

Schedule adherence
Schedule adherence measures the degree to which the specific hours scheduled are actually worked by the agents. It is an overall call center measure and is also one of the most important team and individual measures of performance since it has such as great impact on productivity and service.
Schedule adherence is one of the most important measures the multichannel contact center as well. Specific hours worked is less of an issue in a group responding to emails rather than real-time demand of calls and Web chats, but is still relevant in processing the work in a timely manner, especially if response time guarantees exist.

AHT/ACW
A common measure of contact handling is the average handle time (AHT), made up of talk time plus after-call work (ACW). To accommodate differences in calling patterns, it should be measured and identified by time of day as well as by day of week.
Average handle time is also a measure that is important in determining the other types of multichannel contact workload. It is much harder to calculate, however, given the difficulties of truly measuring how long it takes to handle an email or a Web chat transaction. An email may be opened and put aside for varying amounts of time before completing. Likewise, a web chat session may appear to take longer than it actually does since a web agent typically has several sessions open at once. Therefore each one takes longer based on start and end time. Automated tracking of these actual handle times is difficult with numbers coming from email management systems often overstated in terms of actual handle time.

While AHT is almost always one of the top metrics on any contact center’s list, it’s critical not to focus coaching efforts too directly on the AHT number itself. While it is often desirable to correct procedures that lengthen AHT, you don’t want to coach to AHT numbers. When this is done, AHT goals may be reached, but at the expense of proper call-handling techniques. It’s best to identify the specific steps, words, and behaviors needed on a call and coach to those, not to an AHT number.
System availability and accessibility
 When response time from the computer system is slow, or if it is cumbersome to move from application to application, it can add seconds or minutes to the handle time of a transaction. In the call center, system speed, uptime, and overall availability should be measured on an ongoing basis to ensure maximum response time and efficiency as well as service to callers. For example, if the IVR typically handles 50% of calls to completion, but the IVR is out of service, many more calls will require agent assistance than normal causing overtime costs, long delays, and generally poor service. Or, if multiple applications are needed and it’s difficult to move from one to another, it can mean much additional handle time. Often this will be a measure of performance that resides in the IT department, but is also a crucial measure of contact center performance.

Profitability measures

Another category of performance measures near and dear to your executives’ hearts includes those that indicate the inbound and outbound flow of money in the center, as indicated by the measures below. These next two measures are particularly important to catalog centers, where the calls typically focus on the placement of an order.

Conversion rate
The conversion rate refers to the percentage of transactions in which a sales opportunity is translated into an actual sale. It can be measured as an absolute number of sales or as a percentage of calls that result in a sale. Conversion rate should be tracked and measured for incoming calls, as well as outgoing calls, email transactions, and other web interactions.

Up-sell/Cross-sell rate
The up-sell rateorcross-sell rate is measured by many organizations as a success rate at generating revenue over and above the original order or intention of the call. It is becoming an increasingly common practice, not just for pure revenue-generating call centers but for customer service centers as well.
Although more prevalent in the telephone center, it is also an appropriate measure of performance for other communications channels.

Cost per call
The flip side of revenues involves the cost of running the organization. A common measure of operational efficiency is cost per call or cost per minute to handle the call workload, both in a simple call center as well as in a multichannel contact environment. This cost per call can be simply a labor cost per call, or it can be a fully loaded rate that includes wage rates in addition to telecommunications, facilities, and other services costs.

In setting cost per call, it is critical to define the components being used, and to use them consistently in evaluating how well the center is making use of financial resources over time. While commonly used to compare one company or site to another in benchmarking, this is not a good practice as the components included and the types of contacts will often vary.

Employee measures

Unfortunately, many lists of call center KPIs ends with the above measures. However, it’s vitally important to include measures of success with one more stakeholder group – the frontline staff. Here are two final measures in our guide that address how happy the workforce is and these are critical measures since a happy workforce works more efficiently, provides better service, and stays around longer.

Staff turnover/retention
One way to measure the satisfaction of your workforce is to look at the percentage of staff who are leaving. There can be some telling information in these numbers and you will want to track and analyze the turnover rates in many ways.
Look at the rate associated with different call types, as it may be more stressful or less satisfying to handle certain types of calls. Look at turnover by team to see if there are any supervisory influences in keeping people or driving them away.
And you’ll definitely want to look at the level of performance of the people leaving. If it’s primarily the worst performers leaving, turnover is not such a bad thing, but if it’s your better performers leaving the center, it may be time to re-examine your compensation, recognition programs, and career path opportunities to see what’s preventing the retention of these staff.

Employee satisfaction scores
The final metric on our list is one of the most important ones. We stated earlier that the one metric most closely associated with customer satisfaction was first call resolution rate. However, running a very close second in terms of correlation with customer satisfaction is employee satisfaction. The happier your employees are, the better they’re treating your customers.
Once again, it’s important here to do your own employee satisfaction survey, as the general company one from HR (assuming they do one at all), may not address all the important areas that impact the satisfaction of your call center staff.

An employee satisfaction survey directed at call center staff should ask questions in the following areas: demographics, nature of the work, training and development, performance metrics, work schedules, physical work environment, health and wellness, supervisory support, compensation, and general attitudes toward the center and company.

You will want to perform these surveys regularly and share overall results with the staff so they can see how areas of concern are being addressed.