Showing posts with label Telecom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Telecom. Show all posts

Saturday, April 05, 2014

MVNO Demystified

virgin-mobile-logo
A mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) is a company that provides mobile phone service but does not have its own licensed frequency allocation of radio spectrum, nor does it necessarily have the entire infrastructure required to provide mobile telephone service. As per the MVNO directory 2009, there are 366 active MVNOs and there are another 89 potential MVNOs. The concept of MVNOs was coined by Sir Richard Branson of Virgin Mobile in UK in 1999 and Virgin is still the largest MVNO with over 4 million subscribers in UK. There are currently over 50 MVNOs in US and Netherlands. However in almost every country, the share of subscriber base with MVNO is less than 10% 
There are various forms of MVNOs depending on the value chain activities they cover. The figure below provides an overview of the various activities performed by different entities: 
mvno-value-chain
Image Copyright with Telecom Circle
 The fourth entity depicted as MVNO in the above diagram is essentially the “Thick MVNO” and is the most prevalent form of MVNO.  Key examples of Thick MVNO are Virgin, Lebara, Helio and while that of Mobile Virtual Network Enabler (MVNE) are Ztar, TMNG, Convergys and ASPIDER Solutions.
What does MVNO offer?
MVNOs normally try to leverage on one of the three strategic assets – Brand, Distribution or Existing Customer Base. The existing customer base can be non-mobile customer base that can be cross-leveraged for mobile services. There are MVNOs that try to offer better services for their customers, e.g.  Rabo Bank launched its own MVNO to serve its banking customers better. Communities of interest can come together to form a community MVNO, e.g. fans of Manchester United or McLaren can potentially brand an MVNO to display their sporting affinity. Wal Mart can use its distribution reach and loyal customer base to venture into the MVNO space.
The key strategic asset that MVNO brings to the table also defines its positioning in the market place. The broad classification of MVNOs is as follows
Business MVNOs focus on catering to the mobile services needs of business houses, e.g. Abica in UK offers cost savings on business mobile, landline and broadband services
Discount MVNOs provide cheaper services to their customers and price is their key differentiation
Niche MVNOs focus on a specific niche of the market and charge a premium for the brand
Ad Funded MVNOs have a business model that is based on advertisements and offer to provide free mobile services to their customers return for viewership of the advertisements, e.g. Blyk in UK
Ethnic MVNOs targets ethnic communities or other communities of interest by offering significant value to their customers, e.g. Lebara in UK offers reduced tariffs to its ethnic customers for calling their home countries
Convergence MVNOs are set of MVNOs that leverage on convergence, e.g. BT Mobile in UK and Italy. BT Mobile encompasses not only GSM but all wireless telecoms technologies and leads the field in Fixed-Mobile convergence­

Why do carriers (MNOs) find MVNOs attractive?
Operators look at MVNOs as an outsourcing partners to either reduce cost or increase productivity by reaching out to more customers profitably. No market is homogenous and consists of various segments which may not be equal in size. Operators may find it difficult to profitably target all the segments. MVNOs are a medium to implement a more specific marketing mix to suit the needs of the niche segments. MVNOs also help carriers reduce their costs as they take away a significant portion of operator costs like customer service delivery, billing, marketing, etc. MVNOs are able to offer these services at a lower cost by leveraging on their current assets. MVNOs may also help increase the revenues by way of reduced churn and increased ARPU.
Operators are particularly interested in MVNOs to better utilize their excess capacity. They can off load their excess capacity at marginal costing (at a discount to the normal tariffs) and can thus offer discounts to specific segments without having to offer it to its entire base.

Future of MVNOs
Despite the benefits that MVNOs can bring, the current share of subscribers in most of the markets they operate in is less than 10%. I am not sure if any MVNO is really making enough money to cover its expenses. The reason for this is that there is now a new entity in the form of MVNO that is trying to gain a pie of the value chain without increasing the value of the chain. This means that the margin needs to come from the carriers or through operating efficiencies. There is not enough inefficiency in the operator domain and hence the high margin opportunities are limited. The carriers are already under margin pressure and have a threat of getting marginalized and hence feel squeezed with the arrival of MVNOs.
An MVNO is only as strong as its ability to differentiate its services. An MVNO can differentiate itself through niche segments, its distribution depth and loyal customer base.
According to Whitey Bluestein, widely recognized as the creator of the first MVNO when he developed a virtual network operation for pre-WorldCom MCI in the mid 1990s,
There are three key areas that most new entrants simply have not thought out either tactically or strategically: distribution, customer churn and industry technology.
In many cases, the MVNOs do not have a clear technology roadmap and hence are not able to transition from 2G to 3G to 4G. Being asset light (read headcount), most of MVNOs have a limited ability to forecast future trends, pace of technology changes and hence miss out on opportunities. They have limited access to latest handsets in the operator driven markets unless they tie-up with the operators themselves for the handset deals.
Refer: http://telecomcircle.com

Wednesday, April 02, 2014

BT turns attention to shaking up UK mobile market

A BT Openreach engineer checking lightweight overhead fibre deployed as part of a pilot in Falmouth, Cornwall©Johnnie Pakington/BT
BT is to mount a fresh challenge to mobile operators with cut-price bundled offers using its broadband network and the 4G spectrum it unexpectedly acquired last year.
Having shaken the pay-TV market with free Premier League football, BT is turning attention to reviving its lacklustre mobile business. The telecoms group has not been a major provider of mobile services since the sale of O2 more than a decade ago. 


BT will offer households a TV, broadband, and fixed and mobile telecoms on combined tariffs – the so-called “quad play” bundle that is increasingly popular in the US and Europe. 

It will launch offers for businesses towards the end of the year, according to people familiar with the situation, before focusing on the consumer market.
Those people say the central proposition is around data – taking the group’s fixed-line superfast data connections into the mobile market. BT is in early talks with handset makers about supplying devices, according to people familiar with the negotiations.

Analysts see the strategy as partly defensive. BT wants to reduce the loss of its lines in homes, which have been in decline for many years with people increasingly forsaking fixed-line calls for mobile. 

Offering an additional service has been proved as a way to strengthen customer loyalty, if only because people are less inclined to move a large number of services at one time to different suppliers.
But there is an offensive element to the mobile strategy, at least as far as the traditional mobile operators are concerned. They see the prospect of BT’s strong telecoms brand swinging in with disruptively low prices to entice customers to its premium broadband packages.
Quad play potential
The British market for quad play services is relatively small, with less than one in 10 households with fixed-line broadband also taking a mobile service and most of those signed up by Virgin Media.
But the option of offering such bundles is becoming important in European markets, even to the extent of influencing M&A activity. Telecoms groups such as Vodafone have aggressively pursued fixed-line businesses while media companies such as Liberty Global are adding mobile.
Large incumbent operators such as Holland’s KPN already offer quad play, which chief executive Eelco Blok says has boosted firepower in winning and retaining customers.
Analysts at Espirito said BT was “well placed to do similarly” and convert its 9.7m residential customers to additional mobile services. Espirito estimates that BT could win “several million mobile customers over the next few years”, offering about 5 per cent of revenue market share and adding 1-2 per cent to BT’s growth.

Disruptive deals
As on the continent, BT can innovate in both technology and tariffs to win mobile customers. Over time the company is expected to upgrade existing WiFi “home hubs” linked to its broadband network with so-called “femtocell” technology – in effect creating a small mast (or “small cell” in industry parlance) in the home that uses the 4G spectrum acquired for £200m in the government auction last year.
“How disruptive can BT be?” said analysts at Berenberg. “BT has form in using non-core products like BT Sport to defend its core products like broadband. We believe that it could take the same approach with mobile.”
Berenberg points out that fixed voice minutes on BT’s network have halved in the past six years, and estimates that two-thirds more would be lost by 2020. This is equivalent to £600m of high-margin revenue. “In our view, BT’s mobile opportunity is a disruptive offer aimed at defending its eroding fixed-voice revenue stream.”
BT’s long mobile history
BT has been a competitor in the mobile market since launching one of the UK’s first networks in 1986. However, the 2002 spin-off of O2, which was then called Cellnet, put the mobile business on the back burner, writes Daniel Thomas.
Read more
And that – with the potential to cross-subsidise bundled offers on services – means lower prices for customers and a headache for mobile operators. Although there are scores of cheap branded offers using their networks on a wholesale basis – from virtual operators such as Tesco and Asda – none has the brand or network that BT can leverage.
For example BT could offer an unlimited voice/SMS Sim for as little as £3 per month, with £4 per month charged per gigabyte of data, according to Berenberg analysts. “If BT can defend 30 per cent of the high-margin £600m voice revenues that we expect it to lose by 2020, it could be worth as much as £2bn in value.”

It is not just cheap Sim-only deals, however. A range of pricing options is expected from BT, including longer-term contracts that come with expensive smartphones, and mobile data bundles covering the home.
BT has not yet detailed its plans, only saying that services would build on a “strong WiFi presence”, while otherwise using EE’s network. Further details are likely to be confirmed after its full-year results on May 8.
Rival response

Mobile executives say it is difficult to gauge the impact of BT on their businesses until its packages are revealed. Indeed, analysts still question how disruptive they will be for the mobile industry. 

How disruptive can BT be? BT has form in using non-core products like BT Sport to defend its core products like broadband. We believe that it could take the same approach with mobile
- Berenberg analysts

UK mobile prices are some of the lowest in Europe, and the concept of quad play has not yet taken root, with only Virgin Media backing the strategy. Meanwhile, even if BT managed to sell mobile to half its broadband customers, that would account for only a single-digit share of the overall market.
But given existing pressures on revenues in the sector, mobile executives admit that the additional competition from a fifth mobile player with its own network is unwelcome and could put further pressure on prices.

BSkyB may also need to respond by adding mobile to create its own quad play offers. The recent talks about commercial deals between Sky and Vodafone have been seen by analysts as partly a response to the threat to both groups from a BT that spans the telephony, internet and TV markets.
It remains to be seen whether the average British household wants all these services bundled into one tariff – but this is a question that the former British telecoms incumbent is not afraid to explore.

Thursday, March 20, 2014

2013 Telecommunications Industry Perspective



The central paradox inherent in the business of telecommunications over the past several years was at its most vivid in 2012. Having finally recovered fully from the global economic downturn and come to terms with the challenge of mass broadband and digitization, the industry had to contend with the ongoing issues of how to grow and become more profitable. We define digitization as the mass adoption of connected digital technologies and applications by consumers, enterprises, and governments—a revolutionary movement that is reshaping the sector. - See more at: http://www.booz.com/global/home/what-we-think/industry-perspectives/display/2013-telecommunications-industry-perspective?pg=all#sthash.wPPUs1ma.dpuf
In 2012, data traffic grew at explosive rates, but monetization lagged behind; telecom companies must resolve this paradox this year by choosing how they approach the market.
- See more at: http://www.booz.com/global/home/what-we-think/industry-perspectives/display/2013-telecommunications-industry-perspective?pg=all#sthash.wPPUs1ma.dpuf
In 2012, data traffic grew at explosive rates, but monetization lagged behind; telecom companies must resolve this paradox this year by choosing how they approach the market.
- See more at: http://www.booz.com/global/home/what-we-think/industry-perspectives/display/2013-telecommunications-industry-perspective?pg=all#sthash.wPPUs1ma.dpuf
The central paradox inherent in the business of telecommunications over the past several years was at its most vivid in 2012. Having finally recovered fully from the global economic downturn and come to terms with the challenge of mass broadband and digitization, the industry had to contend with the ongoing issues of how to grow and become more profitable. We define digitization as the mass adoption of connected digital technologies and applications by consumers, enterprises, and governments—a revolutionary movement that is reshaping the sector. - See more at: http://www.booz.com/global/home/what-we-think/industry-perspectives/display/2013-telecommunications-industry-perspective?pg=all#sthash.wPPUs1ma.dpuf
The central paradox inherent in the business of telecommunications over the past several years was at its most vivid in 2012. Having finally recovered fully from the global economic downturn and come to terms with the challenge of mass broadband and digitization, the industry had to contend with the ongoing issues of how to grow and become more profitable. We define digitization as the mass adoption of connected digital technologies and applications by consumers, enterprises, and governments—a revolutionary movement that is reshaping the sector. - See more at: http://www.booz.com/global/home/what-we-think/industry-perspectives/display/2013-telecommunications-industry-perspective?pg=all#sthash.wPPUs1ma.dpuf
The central paradox inherent in the business of telecommunications over the past several years was at its most vivid in 2012. Having finally recovered fully from the global economic downturn and come to terms with the challenge of mass broadband and digitization, the industry had to contend with the ongoing issues of how to grow and become more profitable. We define digitization as the mass adoption of connected digital technologies and applications by consumers, enterprises, and governments—a revolutionary movement that is reshaping the sector. - See more at: http://www.booz.com/global/home/what-we-think/industry-perspectives/display/2013-telecommunications-industry-perspective?pg=all#sthash.wPPUs1ma.dpuf
The central paradox inherent in the business of telecommunications over the past several years was at its most vivid in 2012. Having finally recovered fully from the global economic downturn and come to terms with the challenge of mass broadband and digitization, the industry had to contend with the ongoing issues of how to grow and become more profitable. We define digitization as the mass adoption of connected digital technologies and applications by consumers, enterprises, and governments—a revolutionary movement that is reshaping the sector. - See more at: http://www.booz.com/global/home/what-we-think/industry-perspectives/display/2013-telecommunications-industry-perspective?pg=all#sthash.wPPUs1ma.dpuf
The central paradox inherent in the business of telecommunications over the past several years was at its most vivid in 2012. Having finally recovered fully from the global economic downturn and come to terms with the challenge of mass broadband and digitization, the industry had to contend with the ongoing issues of how to grow and become more profitable. We define digitization as the mass adoption of connected digital technologies and applications by consumers, enterprises, and governments—a revolutionary movement that is reshaping the sector.
On the one hand, data traffic over both wireless and fixed networks continued to increase at explosive rates. Traffic growth is driven by the massive uptake of smartphones and tablets, the mobile Internet, and digitization technologies such as cloud computing, and to a far lesser extent by rapidly increasing machine-to-machine services. Indeed, data traffic appears to have risen even faster than expected.
The result was that many mobile operators struggled to meet demand, and instances of substandard network performance were more frequent. In response, telecom operators continued to invest heavily in their networks. With wireless broadband speeds fast approaching those of fixed-line connections, and with ever more users shifting their online activities to their smartphones, operators will need to rethink their roles within the PC and mobile value chains. In particular, the mobile value chain is becoming increasingly intricate.
Given these challenges, operators must treat 2013 as the year in which they double down on their efforts to resolve this paradox. They must settle on better ways to monetize the flow of traffic over their networks and capture considerably more of the revenue now going to Internet players. They must then use these new sources of income to keep making the investments in new technologies that are needed to build out truly ubiquitous mobile broadband networks on par with the current state of fixed-line broadband, and speed up their restructuring and innovation efforts.
Simply relying on higher demand over networks with limited capacity to boost prices and restore growth will certainly not be acceptable to policymakers and regulators increasingly aware of the importance of fixed and mobile broadband to promote economic growth.
Restructuring for Growth
These will not be easy tasks. Every telecom player will have to make numerous critical decisions regarding its strategic focus and its operating model, as well as the capabilities needed to operate coherently in its chosen markets. These decisions will lead to a significant increase in fundamental restructuring efforts on the part of operators, as they prepare to become Fit for Growth by making the right choices about streamlining their cost structures in order to be able to fund their expansion and investment plans. We expect these restructuring activities to fall into three categories:
Defending the core. All operators must determine exactly what their core business is, and then build it up to the point where it can thrive as an organic growth machine that drives both revenues and profits. At the same time, they must focus on transforming the core into a highly efficient and lean operation. This will require that they learn to tailor offerings to their chosen customer base and segments using sophisticated customer analytics to develop profitable pricing schemes, while offering these targeted customers the best user experience possible.
Expanding into adjacencies. Even as they defend their core business from interlopers coming from outside the traditional telecom space, telecom players must themselves seek out opportunities in adjacent sectors. Which areas they decide to venture into, and to what degree, will depend on their chosen business model. Indeed, some may prefer to concentrate on enabling their business customers to make such moves into adjacent sectors, rather than doing so themselves. In every case, entering adjacencies will require the willingness and the ability to develop suitable innovative products and services—not a traditional strength for most telecom operators. They must also be willing to enter into partnerships with companies that may have more experience in these adjacent areas. Most important, if they are to succeed outside their comfort zones, they need to begin soon to narrow their strategic focus and start making the tough and possibly expensive decisions about where to invest, and which assets—even possibly network assets—to divest.
Pursuing coherence at scale. Restructuring is a difficult process, particularly for companies as complex as telecom operators. Nonetheless, their ultimate goal must be to achieve coherence at the correct scale in whatever new form they choose to take on, and they must end up with an optimal portfolio of products and services if they are to thrive. For some, this may be a relatively simple process. For most, however, it is likely to require a wrenching combination of divestment and consolidation in their search for the correct combination of organic growth and synergistic new businesses.
The Right Models
How telecom operators will pursue these necessary activities of defending the core, expanding into adjacencies, and pursuing coherence at scale will vary. We believe that four business models can move telecom companies away from the vertically integrated structures of the past and enable them to meet the challenges of a disrupted sector while benefiting from existing opportunities. These business models are the network guarantor, the business enabler, the experience creator, and the global multimarketer—models that are not mutually exclusive.
The network guarantor. In this model, operators concentrate on providing their network infrastructure and related services to retail and business customers, promising high quality, reliability, and smoothly integrated platforms and applications, while operating as cost-effectively as possible. Until recently this was perceived as the “dumb pipes” model and was much too conservative for the new digital world. However, more operators are pursuing this model as network traffic grows and businesses look to operators for more and more essential services. Some companies have decided to advance this model by pooling their resources and those of their customers, offering them the ability to choose among different networks and services while saving considerably on operations and network maintenance.
The business enabler. This model depends on a strategy that extends traditional telecom network services to include helping businesses in different verticals serve their own business and retail customers. The business enabler assists its business customers in capturing the benefits of digitization through reliable virtual networking, cloud services, and other integrated services and applications. One model might involve extending the operator’s own billing and collection capabilities by developing platforms and selling them to customers. Another might include providing services that help customers to expand their online retail offerings.
The experience creator. Operators pursuing this model seek to provide their customers with an attractive combination of targeted applications and content and the best possible user experience. Services might include e-wallets, personalized information apps, and access to music, video clips, and games. This model requires deep insight into customers and excellent customer management and service. Thus far, few operators have succeeded in fully implementing this model, because of the strong innovation skills needed and the stiff competition they are meeting from established Internet players.
The global multimarketer. Large operators have the opportunity to expand beyond their home markets into multiple segments and markets, creating value by combining the other three models, carefully managing the resulting product and service portfolios, and reproducing these models and portfolios in new markets efficiently. This in turn will allow them to provide their many customers with unique digital identities and the broadest possible range of digital services.
Operators would do well in their restructuring efforts to consider carefully which combination of these models will be most conducive to their future success. That decision will depend on how well the distinctive capabilities they already possess match up with the set of capabilities that each of these models requires.
The Right Capabilities
The coming year, then, will be one of restructuring. Operators must build the right set of distinctive capabilities for success. This will require the appropriate combination of five key capabilities: enhanced customer analytics, customer experience management, digital enablement, strategic partner management, and yield management. No operator is likely to be able to build all of these capabilities simultaneously and to perfection. What is important is to select the ones most critical for the chosen business model.
Enhanced customer analytics. The success of all four business models depends to a considerable extent on this critical capability. Companies need the ability to gather and analyze data about customers and then use it to create the right mix of price and services for each customer segment and determine profitability over the entire customer life cycle.
Customer experience management. Operators will need the capability to create innovative products and services that are designed to attract and retain customers, and to manage a complete portfolio. Different models will require different types of services: Experience creators may look to provide seamless service across different screens. Global multimarketers will need to be able to replicate this capability in their many markets. By contrast, network guarantors do not need to acquire this capability.
Digital enablement. This capability will enable companies, and especially business enablers, to transform their own internal services and processes—such as billing, authentication and identification, and location-based services—into products they can then offer to business customers, which can in turn resell them to others. Telecom players that succeed in understanding the relationship between online marketing and offline sales, for example, could build platforms for managing so-called multichannel attribution issues for their customers (multichannel attribution includes the relationship between online marketing and its offline effects). Other options might include digital identity services, e-commerce, and cloud computing.
Strategic partner management. Telecom players looking to move into adjacent sectors and new markets will most likely need to partner with others in the broader digital space, because those partners can provide the market footprint, experience, or services portfolio needed to succeed. Managing these deals can be challenging, but those who build a solid capability in this area will be most likely to find and keep the best partners.
Yield management. For every operator, understanding the nature of all their assets and managing them for optimal value are an essential part of creating the appropriate cost structure and freeing up funds for investment in developing the correct model, or models, for the future.
The digital revolution is in full swing, and the telecommunications industry is in the thick of it, providing infrastructure, enabling other players, and waging its own battles. Opportunities exist, but every player in the industry must choose its strategic direction and build the corresponding set of capabilities necessary for success. This choice, and the ability to pursue it, will determine how each player finishes in this critical race: as a leader or an also-ran.
- See more at: http://www.booz.com/global/home/what-we-think/industry-perspectives/display/2013-telecommunications-industry-perspective?pg=all#sthash.wPPUs1ma.dpuf








Thursday, February 13, 2014

US Telecom Consolidation

Refer: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704471904576229250860034510?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052748704471904576229250860034510.html